Professor stabbed in the Bas-Rhin: what explains the uncontrollable violence of these adolescents?

Professor stabbed in the Bas-Rhin: what explains the uncontrollable violence of these adolescents?
Last Wednesday, a college teacher was stabbed by one of his students, 14 years old. A news item that seems to be reproduced regularly today … But where does this violence and these fatal acts come from at such a young age? Experts respond.

Last Wednesday, at the Robert Schuman college in Benfeld (Bas-Rhin), a 66-year-old music teacher was stabbed in the face by one of his students. The author of the facts, a 14 -year -old teenager, then inflicted serious neck injuries before being arrested. Hospitalized in critical condition, he died this Sunday at the end of the day. This drama, which has changed the educational community, is not unique in recent months. But it relaunches the debate on the deep causes of violence in certain adolescents.

A young man with a chaotic course, but not known as violent

The student carrying the blows, educated in 3rd, had neither a backdrop nor reputation of a violent student. But he seems to have been left out during his childhood. Placed from a very young age with foster family, he had suffered violence from his family assistant, condemned in 2024. In college, he was nevertheless spotted for his taste for weapons and his fascination for the Nazi ideology, which had earned him disciplinary sanctions. A few days before the assault, he had drawn “SS” symbols in a notebook.
Despite psychological follow -up and reinforced school support, the boy remained in great fragility. This mixture of vulnerability and disturbing obsessions questions: how was a adolescent followed, without history of violence, has been able to switch to such a passage to the act?

Anger as an answer to the void

For psychologist Amélie Boukhobza, teenage violence is often rooted in a painful identity quest. “Violence, in some adolescents, can be a response to the void, to a desperate quest for meaning or recognition”she analyzes in a previous similar case.

Adolescence is an age of construction, where anger and frustrations accumulate. When educational landmarks vacillate, these tensions sometimes result in extreme behaviors.

Another key point, which could explain this violence: “Impulsiveness Caittered to adolescence (due to a reshuffle of gray matter at the level of the frontal lobe) mixes here with desensitization, nourished by an almost constant immersion in brutal content and a loss of moral bearings “, underlines the psychologist. “By dint of being exposed to brutal images, some young people no longer perceive the weight of their actions, forgetting the consequences for them and for others.”
Its call is clear: strengthen protective nets and offer young people in spaces where to express their need for affirmation otherwise.

The jamming between virtual and real

The psychiatrist Serge Hefez highlights another dimension: the troubled relationship of adolescents to reality. “Biberinized by screens, social networks, video games … Young people evolve in a world cut off from reality“, he alerts to a previous article.

He describes a phenomenon of “derealization”: “This disorder of relation to reality affects many young people and especially many young boys. They do not necessarily have family problems, no violent past, nothing that would make them rock … And yet, they take action “, recognizes the expert. “Now, what makes it possible is the tilting in another dimension.”
Some adolescents suddenly pass through a universe of hyperviolence, where acting becomes possible, without empathy or regret. “”They lose ground with reality, no longer have the same understanding of what death, mourning, suffering “he underlines. A humiliation lived or fantasized, a feeling of revenge, and the tilting occurs.

A collective responsibility

Faced with these dramas, obviousness is essential: school, family and institutions cannot act alone. “”A real educational and health alliance must be created “, Insists Serge Hefez, who pleads for massive prevention.
Amélie Boukhobza abounds: “It is not only a question of containing violence, but of offering young people other ways to build themselves, to feel heard, to give meaning to their frustrations. “

Beyond the emotion aroused by Benfeld’s drama, this case questions our ability to protect adolescents from themselves and provide them with the benchmarks they lack. Because if the acts of action remain fortunately rare, they reveal a growing discomfort: that of a generation in search of meaning, recognition and clear limits in a world where the landmarks are blurred.